By: Alex Rivera
AI tools have entered every industry, but for finance? It has been there for decades. AI and algorithms had always been used to analyse data to spot patterns, and execute trades by financial institutions long before AI tools became mainstream. But now that these tools are freely available, anyone can feed market data into AI models and ask them the questions that really matter, like:
Can Pi Coin reach $2?
Could $APORK outperform it in 2025?
We asked. Here’s what the data and the deeper logic suggest.
Source: ChatGPT
Source: GrokAI
Both GrokAI and ChatGPT suggest the same thing:
- PI does have a $2 potential
- $APORK can outshine PI, nevertheless
Let us understand what they said in detail:
$2 potential of PI
Pi Coin has been trending for a long time, thanks to its USP of letting people mine it for free on their phones. This helped it build one of the biggest crypto communities even before its official launch, with over 40 million users worldwide.
No wonder it has a strong brand recognition and a highly active, viral community.
Since it hasn’t been listed on major exchanges yet, there’s still a chance for big gains in the future. In fact, 65% of its total 100 billion coin supply is set aside for mining rewards. These would be released slowly over time.
Also, Pi is looking towards major events like Pi Day 2 coming up on June 28, 2025, and a possible Binance listing. Such events can increase the hype and boost Pi’s virality.
But again, a $2 price = $200B market cap at full supply might seem very ambitious, as the market price as of 16th June is $0.60. But it is not impossible. For it to sustain that value, its ecosystem must deliver serious utility and manage inflation.
What about $APORK?
Pi can definitely reach $2 by late 2025 if ecosystem milestones (e.g., PI Day 2, dApp launches, major listings, etc.) align with a bullish market. However, a 3.3x increase from $0.60 requires sustained demand, which is uncertain given recent corrections.
But Angry Pepe Fork (APORK) features a unique “Conquer-to-Earn” model, rewarding community efforts to outrank competing meme coins. This, plus the staking mechanism that gives its holders increased APYs for merely holding the coin, gives it a huge structural benefit.
Pi’s 47M users are largely speculative miners, not active ecosystem participants. Its rewards are tied to mining, not dynamic community challenges. So, it limits the coin’s engagement compared to APORK’s interactive model. But APORK’s gamification and introduction of GambleFi could foster stronger loyalty and virality, if done right. This one thing could just be the driving force of APORK’s adoption, which could outshine Pi’s broad but less engaged user base.
A comparison of tokenomics
For better utility $APORK has staking options with 30, 60, or 90-day lockups. What makes it interesting is that your rewards (APYs) increase if you outrank others, adding a fun, competitive layer. This was done to especially encourage people to hold with purpose so that they can build a stronger community and reduce people’s urge to sell quickly
But if we look at Pi, it surely has a large supply of 65B coins that are set aside for mining rewards. As these tokens unlock, they could flood the market and push prices down.So if we look at it objectively, Pi’s staking is more passive, focused on mining rather than community focussed goals.
So, APORK’s staking aligns with meme coin hype cycles, while Pi’s tokenomics face dilution pressures. Yet it is still important that supply mechanics and early adopter reward loops work in their favour for them. Only the future can tell if it does.
About the Author: Alex is a long-time journalist for NewsWatch, using his expertise to explain to readers how technology is reshaping society beyond mere gadgets and algorithms. His reporting cuts through industry hype to reveal the human stories behind technical innovations, offering readers a thoughtful perspective on where our digital future is heading.
Disclaimer:
The author’s views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of NewsWatchTV. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct independent research and consult with a financial expert before making any investment decisions. NewsWatchTV is not responsible for the accuracy of the information provided or any losses or damages arising from reliance on this content.
